What Happens To The Criminal Cases Now That Trump Is Immune?

50 thoughts on “What Happens To The Criminal Cases Now That Trump Is Immune?”

1. Will the other cases end up like the Florida case? 📰 Get 40% off of Ground News: https://legaleagle.link/groundnews ⚖ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam

2. This is great News!! If there is ever a law that i find inconvenient. Ill just ask the Supreme Court to change it in my favor. "Super easy. Barely an inconvenience."🤣☮️

3. We need term limits and enforceable ethics reform for SCOTUS now!

4. We keep hearing "now what for Trump" with respect 🤮 to SCOTUS' ruling, but I haven't heard anything about what it means for Biden? I'm quite convinced after listening to dozens of political and Constitutional scholars that Trump is a "CLEAR AND PRESENT THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY", does that mean Biden can officially address that and it's legal and just part of his job without recourse? Can you talk about how the ruling affects Biden.

5. Under this interprétation do Richard Nixon would have to give incrimination tape

6. The system is broken

7. This legal gymnastics is maddening.
   If the act of taking someone's property was this convoluted and vague yet hyper specific for removing blame of the criminal, people would see how stupid the system is.
   Just imagine two attorneys arguing if a thief was really taking a property, because, according to the law, only items carried by hand and away from the vicinity of the item's owner counts. The defense argues that the owner was not at home so the item wasn't in their vicinity, and the culprit was using a forklift, which is by some other pretty much unrelated law, is allowed to carry boxes of up to 100lbs for a distance of 200 yards during work hours because his job was forklift driver, and they only moved 189 yards before they were stopped.

8. Remember when the Supreme court was asked to weigh in on this subject back in 2023 and refused saying it wasn't their job, only to turn around in 2024 to give him a golden "Get out of Jail Free" card?

   Nope, nothing sketchy going on here. /s

9. His conviction carried no jail time?

10. Can biden decide to just jail trump anyone's and claim that it's an official act in his capacity to execute written laws?

11. Didn’t the 34 felonies occur from crimes committed before he was elected? So how does that have anything to do with the SC ruling?

12. "If you tried to overturn an election, you'll probably want a good lawyer."

    Who needs a good lawyer when you have 6 bad judges?

13. I bet there are 3rd world countries less corrupt than america

14. I hate this place.

15. America is no longer a democracy. Some Americans just haven't realised it yet.

16. I am offended at you, Legal Eagle. Pretty much right after Jan 6th, you had a video decrying it. I agreed with you, and still do. But there has been a lot of evidence that it wasn't as bad as the extremist view that the media portrayed, and you never had a video backtracking at all. I still agree it was a horrible thing to do. But I don't remember you making a video condemning the riots like you did for Jan 6th, and arguable the riots were worse. And you can't even make a video explaining that Jan 6th was horrid, but not as bad as we first thought.

    You have like 6 videos on Trump like "American insurrection" two on Trump using his pardon power calling it "corruption", "carnage" at Lafyette square. And yeah, not great stuff. But you are acting in an subtly bias manor. Biden has done at least one thing equal offensive as any of that. The horrid withdrawal of soldiers form Afghanistan. Relinquishing power to the enemies, along with arms, and making a laughing stock of our solders, and making the 20 years of war and occupation (where American solders gave their lives) a joke.

    Now, i've been waiting for most of a week for you to make a video condemning the attempted assassination on Trump. Instead, you make more videos complaining about Trump. How is the attempted assassination on a former president and prospective (now official) presidential nominee now worth the same outrage to make a video like trump using his legal authority to pardon people? Or people being ushered into the capital (not all peaceful, but the majority). The Layfette Square one is still more offensive I think than Trump being shot at, but you already established a lower standard for making such a video. So where is that video? Instead you complain about trump more while not covering the shooting on your main channel.

    I've loved the channel for years. But I've become more and more skeptical of it as you've covered Trump with utter bias. The last straw is not being fair about him being shot. I don't like to do this, but I am unsubscribing. I Try to not only watch republican or conservative sources. I like to not be in an echo chamber. But you set a standard with those videos. And apparently the standard is to do everything to condemn republicans, and brush anything democrats do under the rug (Not that the shooter has been proven as a Democrat, he may not be, there's superficial evidence he wasn't, and contextual evidence he was, but it was not proven either way). You are too biased, and without being upfront about it to be a fair source to support. Goodbye.

17. Let's see: "Use the Justice Department to wage war on all of his critics, create sham investigations, and even have the DOJ falsify evidence against his rivals."

    My. That sounds suspiciously like what the Biden administration has done against Trump and his allies.

18. I'm thinking differently about that miss now

19. That first line is brilliant lol. "That would have been nice to know before we started all these criminal prosecutions."

    Because the thing we did know, as a country and stretching back to the founding, is that no one is above the law. So where did the Supreme Court pull this out of?

20. How does no one see this as the foundation for allowing dictatorship in the US?
    Gotta wonder if all the claims that Russian interference was real for Trump…

    Man the world is so screwed.

21. Here’s an idea: Instead of the president appointing SCOTUS justices, we put it to a vote. But this would not just be any vote system. Only Lawyers could vote in it and be nominated, this way party politics can’t get as much of a hold on the decision. This system would also allow for the voting off of SCOTUS Justices if the majority of Lawyers decided they were doing a bad job

22. Where do the people turn, when the justice systems fails?

    [no fed posting]

23. Biden is also immune. Just saying…

24. 7:50. A good test of whether financial transactions are public or private would be whether some other president would and could authorize the exact same transaction. Would a theoretical President Pence or Clinton have done them? If so they're official. If not, private.

25. "Presidents cannot be criminals because they cannot be found guilty" per the Supreme Court
    Wh-what?

26. The court stacking, both supreme and lower, is the most damaging thing the conservative movement has done to this country.

27. It still amazes me how those 6 justices didnt sit with the constitution to write their decision… they sat with Trumps indictment 😂

28. There is no equal justice for the powerful in the US.

29. Cool, president is immune to crimes. You can literally do anything you want.

30. To sum up the ruling, the Supreme court witnessed a sham kangaroo court conviction. So now that conviction will get overturned so an innocent man will be free.

31. I don’t believe in America anymore.

32. Cry harder? 🤣🤡

33. Propaganda

34. How exactly would a fake elector scheme be considered illegal under these rules? Or fake, for that matter (what would be the difference between fake and real)?

35. "The Supreme Court created a framework," i.e., they perversely rationalized their interpretation of the constitution to enable corruption. How does the Supreme Court 's decision serve the citizens of the US?

36. this is monarchy shite!

37. Judge, it's not a crime b/c I have money and power.

38. How do we possibly get this genie back in the bottle?

39. Your rhetoric almost got Trump shot. Your a DNC operative

40. I knew Trump was never get punished. Called it ages ago.

41. Lol itd insane in my country the constitution directly status who can judge a president for any crimes, thus stating he is not immune lol lol lol usa is not real you cant convince me you havent just invented that country

42. Campaigning, even while in office, is not an official act.

43. Smoking that LegalEagle pack

44. Supreme court is completely corrupt and there is nothing anyone can do. USA is no longer a great country

45. There are a lot of questions when SCOTUS makes up completely new parts of the constitution that don't exist

46. Does using his private staff to hide evidence and destroy video recordings count as official acts if they are done after discussions with White House staffers?

47. Quit lying to people Trump hasn't been adjudicated as being immune.

48. My law teacher: The Constitution means whatever 5 out of 9 judges in Scotus say what it means.
    Futurama made a joke about it.
    Richard Nixon: "The Constitution? Where we are going, the Constitution doesn't mean squad" Next scene is Scotus Building

49. I’d like to point out that C.J. Roberts also fed Obama the wrong oath of office in 2009. Obama did not say the wrong words and prompted Roberts to correct himself (which he did).

50. So, if an action is official if it takes place in the White House, the Supreme Court's ruling means that Bill Clinton getting himself pleasured was an official act? I'm not an American, so I need these things explained. Suppose some future president were to set up the sexual exploitation of children and young people in the White House–would this be an official act, and immune?

Comments are closed.