Supreme Court to Decide on Historic Presidential Immunity Case #shorts

33 thoughts on “Supreme Court to Decide on Historic Presidential Immunity Case #shorts”

1. Sounds like you're buying the appointment .

2. clear as mud, thanks

3. After Trump had his stroke he changed so much.

4. Thank u! Justice is a beautiful thing!

5. Nice spin on the facts. No one is above the law.

6. It is the legislative branch, not the judicial branch that the executive branch would have to answer to if there was crimes committed by a sitting president. It would be up to the legislative branch, i.e. Congress, the Senate to impeach the president for whatever crimes and then from there once impeached he could be held account, for other things he may have done or may not have done, but it’s not for the judicial branch to decide before the legislative branch does it

7. I can't wait for this whole thing to be over.

8. Sounds like the the Biden family to me

9. He sounds like Bobby Kennedy if only Bobby Kennedy would talk to his words I could support him

10. But didn’t Joe and Hunter Biden engage in bribery with Burisma but the DOJ hasn’t indicted Sleepy Joe.

11. I was cutoff by my phone company, somebody didn't want me to see this. Therefore, I can't comment on it. 😢

12. I think Trumps in trouble

13. He wasnt president so. Wheres the crime ? Besides she broke this so called contract.

14. Other presidents have immunity but not Trump?Sounds like election interference to me.

15. Turn down the thermostat in the White House to the temp it's set at in the courtroom. Conserve energy for everybody.

16. Why are they trying to freeze President Trump? Are they trying to cause him to come down with pneumonia?

17. I think another issue that needs to be addressed on Presidential immunity. When a president conducts an official act, must the President first confer with a government agency or official or confer with Congress before declaring that official act or does an official act just means the President taking action on their own initiative? If a President needs to confer with anyone outside his presidential authority then I would think that outside person or entity has more authority than the President.

18. I can't believe this sham

19. When will they Try the Clintons? The Bidens?

20. Covenant Blood Protection against forces of lying accusations. Amen

21. can we now go back and indict past Presidents for crimes under their administration

22. So, ya mean like Hunter did?

23. Believe it or not, but supreme court are not the smartest people on earth,

24. How about Hunter selling finger paintings for outrageous amounts to help the Biden family?

25. Sounds like Biden

26. Stop with the hypotheticals , we all know what’s right free trump now or lose America as we knew it for the last 250 years … Trump trump trump are only way out of this crapola . 🇺🇸🇺🇸🙏🏼

27. So your speaking in terms of intentional versus unintentional… at least that's what I'm gathering… I could be wrong.

28. This one is hard to understand because 95% of all appointees gave large donations or time to support their candidate or party before they received their appointments. Is that now being considered as a "bribe"?

29. They need to be careful because Obama and Biden may be guilty of murder with that gun running deal they made.

30. The Constitution says after you’ve been impeached. That is why they tried to impeach Trump after he had left office.

31. With all these questions about private transactions, they are actually testing the waters for previous presidents and and politicians. Think about it . They are using President Trump as a test bed …….

32. Theyre trying so hard to get him. Its so funny

33. Hello,
    Where is your Dad, Jay? I haven’t seen him on the show for a couple weeks.

    Hope all is well.

    Thanks,
    Paul

Comments are closed.