Strange Situations…

33 thoughts on “Strange Situations…”

1. Lawyers have a sacred Client Confidentiality that is breached or broken when a third party is there and because he knows both clients, this creates an inherent conflict of interest and a breach of confidentiality; if he reveals what one spouse told him in confidence about themselves or the other.
   
   So now he can't represent either! This makes everything a level playing field in the eyes of the law and the court room.

2. The family law act says anything that you earn before separation means it will be split during the divorce.

3. Say you didn’t withdraw, would it be considered a mistrial?

4. But wait, Mike will put a lien on your settlement before you go.

5. Conflict of interest, Mike should know better

6. How many lawyers are ethical like you?

7. That's the ethical rule, but that's rarely how it actually works

8. You ain't slick Lamplighter

9. Could an interpleader action be appropriate in this situation?

10. someone i know, their mom had this happen to them. But the Husband was a divorce lawyer himself. So he went and talked to alot of family lawyers just to put her in this situation.

11. What % of lawyers follow this advice? 🤔🤔🤔

12. How in the world do you explain that to the husband and the wife? Simply saying, I know secrets about the husband that I cannot tell the wife so therefore you must get new lawyers. Doesn't that give up confidentiality just by doing that?

13. Imagine being married to that ish.

14. Settlement for what?

15. About the only safe thing she can do if she doesn't want her husband to have the money is to have the check deposited into a joint savings account that she and her husband both have full access to… Then she can spend the money because the money is equally hers as much as it is his. Notice I did not say that she could withdraw the money or transfer the money. If she just takes the money then that will come up during the divorce proceedings and she may very well be required to pay either all of it back or at least half of it back to him during the divorce. If it's spent however and she legitimately buys things with it then that would just be a normal course of events for a joint bank account. There may be some more mitigating factors with that plan depending on the exact divorce law in your state but generally money that is spent is considered gone and a part of normal activity for a joint account versus money that you withdraw either right before or during the divorce proceedings is seen as you attempting to hide that money from your significant other.

16. ofc women try to rob the men of their hard earned savings

17. Which they won’t, because they’re lawyers

18. But does that mean you don't get paid?

19. Oh, so they aren't meant to talk to your brother and tell him everything that's going on in your life.

20. Do they need two different lawyers? 😂😂😂😂

21. Was the settlement for damages to just her?

22. Women need men, use men, then throw them aside when their usefulness is fulfilled. Disgusting

23. If you’re forced to withdraw in that situation, do you still get payed?

24. HOW can you even be a lawyer…it seems you have ethics and standards…

25. but let's say you were only client to one of them. then what?

26. That crumple zone underneath is likely compromised

    Get her info and if you get in a crash where it was compromised, get her involved.

27. lawyer duplication glitch

28. Makes sense

29. Good man.

30. I love the simple, simple explanation at the end lmao

31. I have a question if your driving past a golf course and your car got hit by a stray golf ball landing in the road whos liable

32. Wha- huh? How bad was it?? What is this? The Cold War?

33. Arent you a personal injury lawyer anyway?

Comments are closed.