Video

Senate Inquiry on the US PsyOps during Pandemic, Marcoleta at Tiktok Attorney on WPS

En


#Senate #Inquiry #PsyOps #Pandemic #Marcoleta #Tiktok #Attorney #WPS

Senate Inquiry on the US PsyOps during Pandemic, Marcoleta at Tiktok Attorney on WPS
lawyers near me , Senate Inquiry on the US PsyOps during Pandemic, Marcoleta at Tiktok Attorney on WPS

Tags

41 thoughts on “Senate Inquiry on the US PsyOps during Pandemic, Marcoleta at Tiktok Attorney on WPS”

  1. ang ganda ng discussion na to…sana makinig mga senator and congressman dito para my guidance sila on how to handle SCS dispute.

  2. Atty. viernez mag basa ka ng maayos geopolitics kakahiya sa mga studyante mo pati bansa natin pahiya sa sinasabi mong (atin ito)

  3. BIG BIG BIG RESPECT to Miss Sassy. Thank you for educating us po Miss Sassy, Miss Joie and Sir EB. We really need to educate ourselves para di mabudol 🤭

  4. 2 DAYS na ao nakikinig dito kasi un mga sinabi ni Prof Sass di ko makuha lahat loading ako gusto ko kasi matutu mapunta sa Row 1 .. see u both in HK

  5. Joie, I commented on the lovely Atty's Facebook page and asked her to have a LIVE debate with Sass.I hope she accepts the challenge.

  6. In the House of Representatives, Akbayan representative Walden Bello filed a resolution in June 2011 urging the government to look into the process of changing
    the name of the South China Sea to "Western Philippine Sea" Mga Dilawang CCP NPA pala ang may akda ng WPS

  7. dami kong natutunan ngayon. take note paragraph 272, 761, SCS was named by westerners, EEZ juris prudence etc.

  8. 5:13:20 ku-question-in namin ang integridad ni kuya jojo morales, dahil nagsisinungaling siya sa pds niya! ahehe loljk

  9. Hi Ms Joie Ms Sass Sir EBJ Tio.. permission to repost my interpretations based o n ur vlogs last time..
    Salamat sa inyu guys ang gagaling nyo.. Thanks for sharing infos..

    As per layman's term interpretations::
    TRIBUNAL=court/forum

    The TRIBUNAL's last verdict – did not create a final declaration/acknowledging the PH claims of EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS over the Ayungin shoal.
    -Per TRIBUNAL's resolution: We were given the " SOVEREIGN RIGHTS" to fish to explore to visit to observe natural resources in the Ayungin as it is w/n our EEZ.
    But such " sovereign rights"" is NOT equivalent to SOVEREIGNTY.

    -Kung sa housing, u dont have the Land Title yet only the "rights" to stay–so hindi mo pwedi mai binta sa iba coz u dont have the cert of land title–it means,u dont have the certification declaring of ur "absolute ownership" ..
    and d same goes here, the PH cant impose its exclusive rights to others too becoz, having a sovereign rights is not equivalent to obtaining a SOVEREIGNTY to the said islands.

    As per the TRIBUNAL's OPINION:: The PH can exercise the " sovereign rights" vested upon, as expressly stated.

    Also,as per the tribunal's opinion:: given the situation that CH had refused to participate..
    The TRIBUNAL's opinions on the matter were also limited.
    The TRIBUNAL has made RESERVATIONS too in expressing their opinions since they only got limited sources of infos. or incomplete data(w/0 CH's participation).
    And that they had emphasized that their " STATEMENTS.." and / or ""OPINIONS.." did not declare the finality of decisions to determine whether or not, confirming all the claims proposed by the PH..
    They have stated too that before the tribunal can verify and confirm or agree to the claims of the PH –they require that the PH must first be able to obtain the Absolute SOVEREIGNTY on the Ayungin shoal.

    -and such absolute sovereignty must also be duly recognized or declared from d international rulings/bodies/organizations laws of the sea LOS

    -Obviously,PH didnt have sufficient documents/evidences to support our claims of sovereignty over such areas/boundaries.

    -This is due to the fact that prior a TRIBUNAL can come up a final decisions as to what is what..
    Like, what metes&bounds belong to PH, where's the metes&bounds that belong to CH to Vietnam whatever.. Series of investigations observations studies inquiries from involving parties (PH-CH) extensive discussions exchange of opinions–these steps must have been conducted first before a tribunal can achieve a final decisions regarding SOVEREIGNTY on the Ayungin shoal but such investigations /forum did not happen.

    — That was supposedly the intention of the forum to attest if nobody would contradict over d PH's claims of SOVEREIGNTY to Ayungin. Kaso, they failed to create a forum coz CHINA didnt respond to participate.

    NO forum= NO meetings of d minds= NO such Agreemets acknowledged by CH
    =NO final declaration of Sovereignty over the Ayungin.

    on the other hand..
    Also as stated- d TRIBUNAL's verdict,were not meant to be used or not in reference to.. in related to any comments of China over their POV or claims on SCS-south china sea.

    End Game::the TRIBUNAL's statements was NEUTRAL–the disputed areas has remained to be shared by every countries surrounding it..with the connotations to every fisherfolks to fish harmoniously n peacefully😊

    (summary taken from Ms Sass Ms Joie Sir EBJ convos–kudos to these 3 brilliant minds! Many Thanks sa inyung 3)😊 Keep sharing..gagaling nyo..ang talino ni Ms Sass😮

    -disclaimer summary ko lng to pang ROW 69 pov😂

  10. Hindi siya natatakot sa ginagawa niya. Mukha talagang di nagbabasa. Tapos ituturo niya sa mga estudyante niya. At nag dadakdak pa sa social media.

  11. Sayang c Marcoleta kung totoo yang chismis na yan! Wag nman sana na napunta sya sa side ng mga bangag!!

  12. Wow! ano ay ang matutunan ng mga esdudyante pag ganyan mali mali ang itinuturo. Sayang ang matrikula kawawa ang mga estudyante at mga magulang.

  13. Grabe yung knowledge ni Ms.Sass sa IR. Umaapaw yung mga binibigay nya sa atin. Tama yung isang umakyat na kung pag aaralan natun ito sa may bayad napakamahal nito. Befire pa maging presidente si Tatay D follower na ako ni Ms.Sass. nameet namin sya noong debate nila ni gaydarian. Nastar strucked talaga ako. maraming salamat Ms. Sass pati sa iyo Ms. Joie sa walang sawang pag eeducate sa amin. 💚👊

  14. Its very dangerous to change the constitution by a government which is more corrupt than righteous.

  15. Ako talaga ayoko nagaaral ng kagaya sa acads sa school pero hahahaha grabe nakakasira dito ng tulog pero worth it eh. Dami natututunan. Maganda continuous ang learning ng tao. Dito di ka na babayad tuition pero tama matutunan mo. Jusko… ano ba naman yan. Lawyer pa man din, sumikat lang talaga. 😂🤦🏻‍♀️

  16. nakakatakot po pag ganyan ang teacher kasi pag sinabi ng teacher ang student paniniwalaan lahat hirap baliin pag teacher nagsabi. naranasan ko kasi s anak ko yan ang dahilan nya sinabi ni teacher eh! ok lang sana magkamali pero sana tinatama

  17. Can I ask forthe links nang mga citations nyu po. Inaaway kasi ako nang mga kapatid ko. Gagamitin kolang din for reference. Me against them mag isa lang ako hahah

  18. Replay…im almost 70 but if my i could still recall..FPRRD have already discussed something with Pres Xi about the matter…and that atty persona should have been talking about it before.(SCS/WPS)….all i can say. ..WHY JUST NOW ATTY…lumalabas tuloy sumasakay ka na lang sa mga issues….

  19. Very informative about International Law. Salamat Sass sa libreng lecture mo about International issues ng Asian countries, China & Philippines etc…. Parang balik estudyante lang ulit👏👍

  20. kawawa naman ang mga istudyante mali ang natutunan,plus masakit kung nag babayad pa ng tuition?😢😢ay public pala salamat naman

Comments are closed.