Real Lawyer Reacts to It’s Always Sunny (Hero or Hate Crime?)

34 thoughts on “Real Lawyer Reacts to It’s Always Sunny (Hero or Hate Crime?)”

1. Are there any legal IASIP episodes left to review?
   📚 Get Audible for 60% off for the first three months! https://legaleagle.link/audible

2. Tbh whoever scratches the ticket off WITH CONSENT from the purchaser gets the ticket in full. Are you morally a shitty person for not dividing the money earned with the purchaser? Yes. Are you legally obligated to share? No.

   But to be fair you should look over your shoulder bc if you want act like a bad person, except repercussions

3. I'm with you on the "It's a 2 dollar scratcher, who cares", but sadly I'm constantly behind people in line at the corner store who take those things very seriously. No legal basis, purely emotional attachment. Maybe they can all sue for emotional damages?

4. Out of curiosity, even though hate speech is legal in the US, if someone where to be assaulted as a result of their hate speech (as in calling a black person the n-word and getting punched in the face for it), how would that work from a legal perspective? Obviously, assaulting someone is illegal, but if you're saying racial slurs to minorities, what did you expect would happen?

5. Dee holds the ticket on trust for Dennis as she bought it with his money which makes him a beneficiary and her the trustee/legal owner

6. Ok but does legal eagle have a license to practice bird law?

7. It's completely….arbitrary 😎

8. That’s fine and all, but I wanna know what you know about Bird Law.

9. Why did you skip over Charlies responde to the Black woman

10. Has LE ever done a video on when Jake and Rosa went to prison in Brooklyn 99? I feel like that trial had issues

11. this video was great, you seem like a fun person

12. 9:00 is this because of the fungible nature of money?

    i.e. she payed for the ticket from her own balance of money, that just so happens to include the petty cash from her boss? And thus the ticket, and the risk there-in, belongs to her.

13. I'm sorry, did you say homophoMic?

14. Whether or not Mac meant arbitrator, arbiter also works here. “a person who settles a dispute or has ultimate authority in a matter.”

15. Real lawyer but can't pronounce the word "homophobic"? Bit strange to me

16. Schrodinger's lottery ticket?

17. 10:10– Leonardo DiCaprio should take this advice.

18. I really wish we got to see Devin's reaction to the N bomb. Censored, obviously, but his facial expression must have been hilarious

19. Sounds like this shows writers got their facts straight before distorting them at their leisure tbh

20. "The law says nothing about who deserves what, it's all about compensating people for past wrongs" thats probably the best summary of the US legal system or any legal system for that matter

21. Do you study bird law?

22. I really appreciate how explained bird law in detail.

23. David has no right being this funny…. "I am okay, I just need my DONALD TRUMP IS A RAPIST"

24. YOU FORGOT WHERE THE boss stated he pays her under minimal wage.

25. looks like a model "i put on my weirdest suit!"

26. That suit is sweet

27. Objection: I believe Dee would have a case for specific performance because the nature of lottery tickets is that each one is unique in its payout. The ticket she bought is unique in that it’s worth $10000 but if she went and purchased another one it is more likely to be worth $1 than $10000

28. I say the single grade at the end of these videos are greatly influenced..!!

    They're supposed to be graded on legal realism, that's it. I claim the grades are higher than he leads up to, do to enjoyment..!!

    I move to enact a second, separate grade based on personal enjoyment.

29. What means "Homophomic"..??

30. I think the age 21 issue is to do with legal drinking age.

31. IASIP exposing arbitration for what it is. A scam.

32. So I think law goes out the window when they try to screw over Dee

33. I really want LegalEagle to be in an episode of Always Sunny.

34. By Dee's own admission however there's no adequate remedy at law because the way she describes the ticket is not as a good with X value, but as a measure of "hope," turning it from a fungible good to something with pure intangible value to the group!

Comments are closed.