MUST WATCH: LIVE Legal Breakdown of Trump Immunity at Supreme Court

25 thoughts on “MUST WATCH: LIVE Legal Breakdown of Trump Immunity at Supreme Court”

1. 0:50: 🏛️ Analysis of legal implications of presidential immunity post-office at the Supreme Court.
   4:32: ⚖️ Legal battle over presidential immunity at Supreme Court intensifies with upcoming appeal.
   9:30: ⚖️ Analysis of potential criminal acts by a President during office and immunity post-office.
   14:20: ⚖️ Discussion on handling protestors with student visas and utilizing technology for arrests.
   18:30: ⚔️ Support for Israel amidst rising anti-Semitism in the US and global conflicts.
   22:54: ⚖️ Legal organization offers support to pro-life individuals facing legal challenges and seeks donations.
   27:16: ⚖️ Legal battle to defend pro-life counselors at Supreme Court with ACLU involvement.
   31:36: ⚖️ Analysis of potential legal consequences for former presidents based on official vs. criminal acts.
   36:00: ⚖️ Analysis of potential immunity for former President Trump and its implications on legal actions.
   40:57: 🏛️ Organized protests at universities lack student involvement and appear well-funded and coordinated.
   46:04: ⚖️ Analysis of Democratic party transformation from party of the people to elite, urging unity to defend freedom.
   50:22: ⚖️ Legal defense efforts for pro-life centers, appeal to Supreme Court, and call for sanctions against Iran.
   55:31: ⚖️ Discussion on legal consequences of advocating for domestic terrorism and free speech violations.

   Tammy AI: Get video info faster & better

2. CHARGE OR PROSECUTE JACK SMITH WITH FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST TRUMP if the cases are dismissed … HE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUSE ANYONE WITHOUT A CRIME OR EVIDENCE OF THE CHARGES AGAUNST HIM….!!!
   Why should he JACK SMITH & other PROSECUTORS BE ALLOWED to make false charges and get away with it
   the PROSECUTORS
   ought to be charged for false pretences against TRUMP… wher ther is NO CRIME….???? its totally absurd for PROSECUTORS like breaking and entering without authority… until caught…!! THEY NEED TO BE DUSBARRED FOR FALSE PRETENCES UNDER SWORN OATHS… hav been Violated….!! by officers of the LAW..:😂😂😂😮😮😮

3. 45:27 the universities are afraid of losing foreign student dollars. Some of them have 2/3 or 3/4 foreign students. Foreign alumni are an issue, too.

4. I still say that this case at SCOTUS is more important for Biden than Trump, the question was this case for Biden aimed after he leaves office.

5. waving a flag pther than d US flag by protesters should b thrown out of d US

6. If Trump doesn't get immunity and still has to go through what he is then Obama Biden and the rest should be charged and.have no immunity

7. Absolute immunity for as his speech

8. If presidents don't have immunity, then prosecute Biden for the death of our military personnel in the Afghan withdrawal.

9. If presidents don't have immunity, then prosecute Biden for the death of our military personnel in the Afghan withdrawal.

10. If presidents don't have immunity, then prosecute Biden for the death of our military personnel in the Afghan withdrawal.

11. God well send you strength to hell if you get a abortion thats strength up murder

12. They are definitely going to split the baby in this.

13. Trump certainly wanted to be at the Supreme Court case!

14. Look into John Kerry's wife she likes funding radical protesters or look into the Hillary foundation

15. Im very concerned they are not going to hold up the law.

16. I would assume as long as federal law doesn't contradict his constitutional authority he would be fine.

17. You obviously havent viewed the the J 6 tapes. You just cant make me believe the J 6 so called riots are legit when the capitol police were giving a tour of the capital !

18. You would think that all these charges were while Trump was President. So why wouldnt it be Federal and not State?

19. The first thing we have to look at all these charges is why bring them right before the election? Why are States able to bring all these frivolous lawsuits that have never been served on previous Presidents?

20. This is the 4th female woke university president who passively allowed disgusting anti-semite protests, which threatened murder and mayhem against Jews for even existing to be in the news. Maybe she, too, can do her "rug dance" (military term for being "called on the carpet) for Congress.

21. I vote for Presidential Immunity unless youre a Democrat!Lmao

22. Besides destructionism, these protestors are after the right of any semite (unless with destructionism bona fide credentials) to obtain an education. Will someone stop hiring "woke" passive women as Universitu Presidents, who pledge all honor and loyalty to "wokism" instead of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (in this case, education)?

23. Summer of 2020 redux. This time, instead of squatters protesting the right of Police persons to exist at all plus the right of any non-black person to exist, they are protesting the right of any non-terrorist person to exist. Only those engaged in destructionism (Mises) have the right to exist.

24. What about if you want the billion, fire that prosecutor??!! My plane leaves in an hour. If not bribery, certainly coersion.

25. If bribery is an impeachable offense, then that would fall to congress to do its duty and there fore would be punishable by the criminal courts.

    Why are they trying to bypass congresses responsibilities.

    We are a nation of checks and balances and the separation of powers.

Comments are closed.