LIVE! Real Lawyer Reacts: Is Kohberger Trying To Fix The Jury? New Documents Revealed

42 thoughts on “LIVE! Real Lawyer Reacts: Is Kohberger Trying To Fix The Jury? New Documents Revealed”

1. Peter, Is it me or did the prosecutor #BillThompson who was concerned about tainting the potential jury pool in the #BryanKohberger #Idaho4 case with the #JurySurvey disseminate MORE information to MORE ppl than the 400 ppl who were polled randomly by READING the questions on a worldwide stage yesterday❓ Can you imagine how many ppl who hadn’t heard about the case NOW are tainted by what he read in the televised hearing yesterday❓‼️ #LatahCounty #MoscowID

2. Wouldn't a survey lead ppl to look at the media reports & YT stuff they're being asked about? Thus, ultimately, leading to prejudicing the pool more? Seems reasonable that BOTH sides pre-approve the questions.

3. I can’t help but remember the first hearing. BK and Ann did not put on a plea. Ann asked to drop charges and take the death penalty off the case. I am wondering about a what if. If the judge had addressed a plea agreement and out in a guilty charge would all this have been avoided. Life in prision without parole. Could it had gone that way?

4. They ARE affecting the jury, since now who did not know about the case will for sure look for it. That only shows me that the defense have no way to prove he is not guilty, but they will try anything to take him out of there. In my opinion, total shame that a lawyer can do this type of work. And 4 people were cowardly killed…

5. The difference with Murdaugh was that the questions asked in the survey were determined and agreed to by the defense, the prosecution, AND the court. It wasn't just the defense sending out whatever they wanted to.

6. The defense hopes memories will fade, especially for the state’s witnesses. But they can’t delay the trial indefinitely; the judge will set the trial date sooner rather than later.

7. I thought that Kohberger, was guilty, until 6 months in, but NO MORE.

8. This is what his lawyer is spending time and money on right now. How about she start reading the TON of evidence against Kohberger and how to best defend him and stop playing games trying to get him off on bs. I wish she would go back to the judge and whine again about she has no time and may not be ready until 2026! Justice delayed. Seeing her at the scene before Kohberger even got back from Pennsylvania gave me OJ feelings of here we go, grabbing the headlines lady, you haven’t even met your new client. He may not even have wanted her. He may have wanted a deal. He may confess to her. But she ran right down to that house of horror while the cameras were rolling. I bet these two are two peas in a pod.

9. Defense first action was invalidation. Drop all charges, drop death penalty, drop dna on sheath and how you knew it was BK drop everything is Ann’s defense. Ann has no defense only to attack court and jurors and attack mode. Probably picking up on BKs vibes.

10. He just wanted to personally tell them his alibi how his dna was on the button. He likes that personal touch. I think he wants a plea bargain and Ann won’t do it yet. With all the motions that is what it will come down to. Personal touch.

11. everything sealed….so suss

12. Q: Shouldn't the judge and prosecution have any say about the contents of any survey? Or at least be approved officially by the judge?

13. Hi Peter, had spinal fusion surgery yesterday in London, got 3 weeks off, just wanted to say I will be watching your back catalogue, helps me with the recovery. Thank you Rajeev

14. if there was nothing shady about the defense actions, why was it done surreptitiously? AT and team asserted “no connection” “lack of DNA” in past motions, during a gag order and without a press to flesh out further information. Perhaps this information was disseminated in the survey. I imagine the state would be big time angry with sort of shenanigans. I disagree Peter, I think the judge will smack defense and should. It was alarming enough to the public to bring it to the state’s attention.

15. AT is a shady One

16. I’m watching the Apple River trial and I live in MN it happened right across the river in WI and most of the people involved lived in MN.

17. Just because it's common practice doesnt automatically mean it's ethical. Court is about out-maneuvering your opponent more so than fact finding.

18. I don't think a change of venue will change anything. My husband, who pretty much lives under a rock, learned about this case cause all the guys at work were talking about. In Wisconsin. In a little town of 5,000 people. At a workplace that has about 25 people on all three shifts….
    They work at a rendering plant and had some "interesting" talks about the guy that did this. If you know what a rendering plant is you know what they mean.
    But my point, they know about it, and most times, they all talk about darts, pool, the weather, or are too busy giving each other crap to talk about serious things. But all the guys are following this. If it's like that here, x amount of miles away, it hits harder in that state.

19. Perhaps you should also cover the Defence's reply to provide both sides of the argument and not just the states should fair, not biased, be an ideal you uphold. Here it is: https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR29-22-2805/2024/040124-Reply-Support-of-Motion.pdf It begins by calling out the states continued bs/unconstitutional dirty pool:- The State knew by March 11, 2024 the survey was being conducted by a legitimate company. By March 21, 2024 the Defense had explained basis and validity of the survey, yet Friday afternoon the State filed a motion alleging violation of the Revised Nondissemination Order.

20. It will be wise to get the facts straight and the evidence from both sides in this situation before i make a final choice on guilty or not.
    This would be my answer to each of the survey questions.
    Motivation: no amount of media articles will be able to hold up to all true evedince..
    IMO
    Thanks Peter 👊
    TC

21. Defense isn't delaying they could conduct the other county's survey's tomorrow. Latah is already done.

22. That’s the only objective way of discovering the attitudes….well, as close as it could be. These are scientists and experts unlike Bill Thompson they are using the evidence based approach that can be done by using general principles of science. The questions must’ve taken so much work to put together making sure that there’s no criticism.

23. Why would you irresponsibly say "Kohberger Trying To Fix The Jury?" vs trying to get a fair trial by change of venue if necessary? The prosecution knew this survey was going out. They're playing dirty pool after the fact complaining jury fixing. The questions relate to info already in local papers – some 300 – so it queries what the respondants views are from whatever info they have already read. Its a completely scientific survey of 400 – 1% of population by an expert that's done the very same in Idaho in past. "fix the jury" prey tell how the fck do they do that. Practice no paying well? Need to click bait? Ahhh maybe that's unfair – just like your tar and feather. You should know better.

24. Defensive shared the information but the prosecution is making it up. There’s a recording to prove it.

25. Then need to compare the sample against the neighbouring counties. This is worst than the elementary school. These are basics I learn about most of the world’s countries and those 4 I lived in I learned languages, studied even in Greek.

    Arrogance is the basted. It bites you for your back.

26. Seems more delay, it will be years before a trial happens, not confident in state legal team, they have little experience with capital case

27. How do you make opaque colors that aren't see through?

28. the gag order needs to go. the media has propagated ridiculous lies in service of the prosecution, to the point that there are people who still to this day believe easily disprovable lies (i.e. that kohberger was stalking the girls on instagram, that his car was caught on video at the scene, that the pings place him at 1122 king rd, etc).

29. Thompson and Jennings are disingenuous sleaze-bags

30. Bryan lounge ever is not paying for his defense is he? So why van Idaho pay for this why spend this kind of money what an expensive defense the state is paying for

31. I watched part of the Apple River trial. I keep going back and forth, with my opinion.🤔

32. People think BK did it because He has been arrested for it. There really has not been any evidence released except DNA and some cell phone GPS. I personally feel in a case of this magnitude- change of venue should be required. I felt Murdoch case should have been moved to another State.

33. I’ll be closely watching the Kent Mahwinney trial, associated with Jennifer Dulos. 👍

34. I heard they were asking about blood under zana's nails

35. Actually reads “baldly”, so not sure what that means…bad or bold?

36. Iirc they did surveys just like this in Freemont and Madison Counties in ID in the Vallow/Daybell case. It wasn’t a problem in that case. In fact, the data they collected was imperative in why they changed the venue to Ada County.

37. What is with them and the number 400? 400 witnesses? 400 surveys? All they did was raise attention to the case by issuing these calls

38. If a expert want to hypothetically pole people to show how international and national media coverage can influence perspective ordinary people in general then I think it should be allowed.

39. Funny how the title says OJ's lawyer and not Epstein's lawyer. L&C knows this is a bad look.

40. With a straight face this man said it is easier for a celebrity to get indicted. unbelievable.

41. My coworkers brother is the River stabbing victim 🥺

42. Im confused, the defence team wants the trial delayed until 2025 because they don’t have time to go through all the evidence, yet they have time to phone potential jurors?? Huh? What am I missing here? 😮 when I heard his lawyer use this excuse in court this week, I thought this – get more lawyers to help you sift through the evidence you nut, basically you are telling the teacher (judge) you don’t have time to do your homework 🤷‍♀️

Comments are closed.