#LIVE #Read #Trial #Verdict #Watch #Dissecting #Charges #Jackson #FUMING #Verdict #Form
#lawyeryouknow #karenread
View the entire Karen Read playlist here:
Chapters:
00:00 Welcome
01:04 Intro
03:30 Karen Read Verdict Forms
06:15 Video Jackson Verdict Form Argument
17:01 Live – Jury Question
18:57 Live – Verdict Form Change
27:50 Live – Jurors Recieve Supplemental Instructions
33:00 Q&A
37:24 Judge Reading Charges
54:21 Q&A
58:13 Judge Reading Charges
1:12:12 Q&A + Poll
1:17:59 Live – Court – Lunch break
1:19:40 Q&A
1:20:45 Judge Jury Instructions
1:24:07 Picking Jury Alternates
1:25:52 Q&A
1:27:38 Verdict Form Example
1:33:33 Q&A
1:43:30 Conclusion
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a personal injury or wrongful death case? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727) 441-9030 or email us at [email protected].
✅ For business inquiries contact me at [email protected]
✅ Let’s connect:
Twitter – @LawyerYouKnow
Instagram – @tragoslaw
Facebook – @LawyerYouKnow
TikTok – @LawyerYouKnow
✅ Join our email list here –
✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here –
✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here –
*SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER – 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2. Questions are answered on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction.*
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE
lawyers near me , LIVE! Read Trial: Verdict Watch – Dissecting The Charges + Jackson FUMING Over Verdict Form
OVER 317K in views GET it Peter T !!
I’m thinking this long might be a hung jury… I think if it was an acquittal we would have had a verdict by now, assuming the jury saw all the reasonable doubt that we all saw.
I think the Albert's paid a jury. How DO YOU RECONSILE THE UNBROKEN TAIL LIGHT AT 5 AM AFTER IT WAS SUPPOSE TO BE BROKEN AND ON THE GROUND 3 HOURS EARLIER
I don’t understand the delay in a verdict. The independent experts testified there was no way a car caused the injuries. As such the prosecution did not prove their case. That should create reasonable doubt in any intelligent persons head and a not guilty verdict.
What are the jurors doing? Clearly don’t understand the job. Guaranteed there is a simple Simon in there with ADD causing the problem.
For just the fact the evidence wasnt collected immediately and left in an open crime scene for a week..come on ppl think about that..snow is not a good enough reason if u think a murder occured there u get the evidence u cant leave a crime scene open for a week ppl just stopping over …please
Lengthy and confusing jury instructions…
How Karen Read should've looked during trial😶🤐😞✍📃🙎💔 NOT 🗣🙎😆🧑⚖🙊👨👨👧👦🙄 during court ⚖. I mean, did she forget where she was? Her lawyers should have told her this after listening to Proctor. She came across like, you're going to get it! But if she seemed 😔 and embarrassed 😳, the jury would've most likely empathized with her!
She feels like a 🤩 and nobody can wait to see her 🎬 🎞 ⁹
49:53 the WAY she is reading right here is very biasing IMO
I can’t even listen to the judge sorry
I have no faith in the justice system after watching this trial, especially the case in Georgia, who is Young Thug? How do you get rid judges like that
Watching this trial I have no faith anymore in the justice system, especially the trial of the young thug in Georgia I think we need as a country To rebuild our Justice system
A "That's the way we've always done it" attitude from the judge regarding the form. The greatest barrier to change and progress…
Why is the FBI involved?
No matter what i honesty think Karen down it not intended to do it its very sad on both saids
I would have been confused by not having a not guilty verdict on the forum.
I watched Whitney and John and Peter Play that game with M&Ms I enjoyed it y’all are funny by the way, I live in Tallahassee, my entire family, my children are straight up Seminoles ! David is got a puppy and his name is noles my brother-in-law is an attorney for the state he went to Nova law school. How did you like Tallahassee when you were going to FSU?
Designing a form with some charges having two options — guilty/not guilty — and other charges only having one option — guilty — is terrible UX design. Terriible awful bad misleading and likely to trick people into doing something they don't want to do. Certainly likely to generate questions every time. Fighting a request for consistently-worded options is just mulish.
Yes the word here is simplify verdict form. Lay people are not law students there is legal terminology very confusing same as medical terminology lay people are not familiar with medical terminology. Jury instructions very confusing
I love listening to you analyze the law!
I heard that yesterday a juror was dismissed for making a face of disgust when the Alberts appeared. Is it Constitutional to dismiss a juror for a facial expression? At some point, I think a line is crossed where judge is trampling First Amendment rights.
All due respect Peter but lawyers don't know how to write anything that is NOT confusing.
Better be guilty, evidence points to guilt, all the rest is crap against the wall!
What about Subject Matter Jurisdiction that has yet to be proven, for the record
Even with new form, how does jury indicate not guilty of second degree but hung on manslaughter? Amateur hour in Norfolk Co.