Video

LIVE! Lawyer Reacts: Explosive Battle In Court Between Kohberger Jury Bias Expert & The Prosecutor

En

LIVE! Lawyer Reacts: Explosive Battle In Court Between Kohberger Jury Bias Expert & The Prosecutor


#LIVE #Lawyer #Reacts #Explosive #Battle #Court #Kohberger #Jury #Bias #Expert #Prosecutor

#lawyeryouknow #universityofidaho #moscow #idaho4

Watch Our Entire Bryan Koherber Playlist Here:

This is the YouTube account to follow for streaming video: @judgejohnjudge

🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a wrongful death or personal injury case? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727) 441-9030 or email us at [email protected].

✅ For business inquiries contact me at [email protected]
✅ Let’s connect:
Twitter – @tragoslaw
Instagram – /tragoslaw
Facebook – /tragoslaw
TikTok – /tragoslaw
✅ Join our email list here –

✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here –

✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here –

*SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER – 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2. Questions are answered on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction.*

🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE

Intro Music: WNAQ9M6UJF
Outro Music: 7RELUAQ9VY
criminal lawyer , LIVE! Lawyer Reacts: Explosive Battle In Court Between Kohberger Jury Bias Expert & The Prosecutor, law,lawyer,lawyer you know,tragos law,university of idaho,university of idaho murders,idaho murders update,moscow idaho,idaho college murders,kaylee goncalves,latest news on idaho murders,who is jack idaho murders,latest news idaho murders,idaho murders updates,idaho murders roomates,madison mogen,xana kernodle,ethan chapin,idaho student murders,idaho,news,idaho murders vigil,university of idaho murders true crime,university idaho murders

43 thoughts on “LIVE! Lawyer Reacts: Explosive Battle In Court Between Kohberger Jury Bias Expert & The Prosecutor”

  1. So, my degree is in psychology and part of my training included tests and measurements. The way the survey is written is so poorly done. They can write questions in a way that does not lead the examinee in any particular direction. There are test and survey developers, who know how to write more balanced questions that don’t lead the rater. And yes, the way you write the questions can be done so that it’s forced choice items as well as using an adaptive testing format which means that if a person answers a set of items a particular way, they stop testing at that point or move forward—-this means everyone isn’t exposed to the same questions. It’s very technical and is probably a technique best used when they are doing jury selection rather than at this stage, but that is my two cents. Any survey right now will definitely spoil the jury pool.

  2. TRUMP ISN'T GETTING A FAIR TRIAL IN NYC … CAN HE MOVE HIS CASE OUTSIDE OF NYC ? ESPECIALLY IF THEY MOVE THIS CASE ??? THERE IS FAR MORE BIAS AND MEDIA COVERAGE IN HIS CASE …(HIS IS A CASE THAT I THINK SHOULD BE MOVED) …. HOWEVER WHERE DOES IT END ???

  3. What is the price of “wasting a single juror” v discovering they have heard he’s a stalker?

  4. Question…. Being BK has court appointed attorneys is there a limit on how much $ they are able to use in his defense?

  5. I WILL SAY , Older people don't usually go on social media and younger people in there 20s-30's are usually more focused on their own lives may not have heard of this case because they haven't ran it on the tv news as much as on youtube… I asked my daughter and her friends (26 yrs-32yrs) they never heard of the case they don't even watch the news outside of the weather … they're too busy working … my mother who is old never heard of it but they all looked into it after i asked them ….what is the point of the survey if it is going to alert and familiarize the public to the case and , DOESN'T IT ACTUALLY HURT THE DEFENSE ?

  6. The judge is trying to keep both sides happy but the prosecutor is angry that his own words were used against him

  7. Because the non-dissemination order was issued in January in the Bryan Kohberger case. The prosecutor did nothing wrong, this is transparency in the court system. He did nothing wrong by speaking about this at the press conference. Nothing at all. Every single solitary LE person talks about probable cause when a high profile case arrest comes up. Come on, let's be real here.

  8. Finding out the stalking is false was surprising. They really do think Bryan is innocent. We probably only know around 1% of the information that surrounds this case. Anne Taylor is certainly doing her very best for him. I feel this whole “show” was part of Anne’s bigger plan in getting the venue changed. I don’t care where they change it to, I think they might find it hard to find impartial jurors halfway around the world because this case is global. Thanks as always Peter for breaking it down. By the way, my son is at the Master’s today, all the way from Jersey! If you can get a ticket, GO 😊!!

  9. Are they trying to set precedence with this case ? if so , do you think the judge will grant moving the case out of latah?

  10. The public is always going to have opinions , if they get to move this case out of town, will this mean that all cases in the US will have the right to move their cases out of the town of the incident ? and what problems will that cause ?

  11. I don't much care for Taylor. I feel like she's just in it for her 15 minutes of fame. I would bet that HER client is teaching her how to do her job. Being he's so well educated in this kind of thing. Just my opinion. I've been tracking this case from the start and have watched and read everything I can find about it. At this point in time I'm leaning more towards guilty but I have lots of questions and none of us have seen ALL the evidence so until that happens I'm staying open to anything.

  12. Its RIDICULOUS that they do not have a "We are not saying these questions are true or false but we are wondering if you have heard…" to the beginning of the survey.

  13. Sorry Peter. The State DID disseminate a "stalking" accusation on page 16 paragraphs 1 & 2 of the PCA! Now, Thompson claims that in not factual? How can it be the Survey and not the State/PCA and/or not the Media's megaphone? Which one is it? You can't attribute it to the survey!

  14. You can ask questions to jog memory without giving information – like "Have you heard if there was DNA involved at all". Either they have or havent. Then you dont specifically tell them where and whos it was. "Did you hear his dna was on the knife sheath?" is such a ridiculously specific question that gives that information if they hadn't heard that yet. And then they are like trying to say, Look – bias! 🤦🏼‍♀️

  15. I don’t necessarily think these are good due to the fact if I had rcvd a survey and had not heard of the case the first thing I would do is go look into the case!

  16. This is fascinating! And if any time this is most relevant it is now, in this time of social media and bias news.

  17. Stalking the victims is going to be powerful evidence & testimony, and it has not been made public by the prosecution whether BK did this.
    All of that data (cellphone & online analysis) is currently in the possession of the FBI and has not been shared publicly yet. I believe the prosecution is keeping that in their pocket and they don’t want it brought to the forefront yet, which is why they are arguing so strongly against using that information in the survey.

  18. Here is my question. So, you are calling 400 people up in this small county. Are these 400 people actually permanent residents. You are asking all these questions…….. but are they going to then are these actual people that were asked then going to be called for jury?

  19. Bill is unprofessional the pca says he stalked that’s why they asked for bk historical data for cellphone

  20. Bill Thompson arguments are dumb because the media has said everyday bk is an incel stalker wtf we taking bout

  21. I’m more surprised that 400 people actually took the survey! Nowadays most people refuse to. How were they delivered? By phone, email, text?

  22. The expert was impeccable… Judge Judge and Bill Thompson were both sub mediocre and deplorable… He doesn't want things to be spread more?!! All information was pulled from the media AFTER it's been massively spread… The expert is respectable so what is the Judge going to do now, dispute his reputation and his professionalism?! it's ridiculous!

  23. You should dedicate an episode to MAGA cultists to educate them on being able to change their opinion. Instead they double down with hate and anger and it’s destroying our country!

  24. Look at the way Fox bews spreads False information 🙄 They got sued for it!! How r they still on the air 🤮

  25. "I was driving around by myself that night. I have no idea where…just not where you think I was."

  26. The pca says he stalked it literally says that so why the hell is billmmade now diss the pca is riddled in lies n bk should be free bk she have never been arrested period

  27. For info. Watch the Rolo Mota * information, then tune into Interview Room * lots of real information there. Is the university protecting a student they can't admit they collect from?

  28. Judge is biased af imo I can tell by how he violated his right just simple cause bill made a motion n fling some shit across the room judge his balls are in bill Thompson pocket

  29. On the subject of bias, it follows the he wouldn’t have a fair trial in another country with the amount of coverage this case has had. Commit an absolutely nuts, multiple victims stranger on stranger crime, expect the world to hear about it.

  30. Peter, why did you purposely skipped the parts where both defense attorneys are firmly stating they believe in their client’s innocence and they have the PRIVILEGE to defend him?

  31. Peter i watched the entire hearing on Emilys live stream. What was determined exactly what you said. What is public record 🤔?? Whats in the public is different than whats in the court documents. Definitely a spicy hearing. I appreciate AT fighting for her client. But what the defense is arguing is that there can b information that a potential juror may have in their brain that don't even know they have that can prejudice Bk, that can happen no matter where they go. The argument was, being under oath doesn't necessarily guarantee a juror will b fair even if they say they can b fair can they really though?? Those juors can be found anywhere so y change venue causing tax payers more money and causing the victims families and witnesses do the leg work to have to travel. I know its BKs rights that need to b protected however like i said i dont buy the defenses argument.

  32. Anyone else frustrated how much judge judge drags everything out. If he keeps it up, we can’t start the trial until 2026

Comments are closed.