Video

LIVE! Is The Commonwealth Dropping Counts 1 & 3? What Did The Jurors Tell Them?

En


#LIVE #Commonwealth #Dropping #Counts #Jurors

#lawyeryouknow #karenread

View the entire Karen Read playlist here:

Chapters:
0:00 Welcome
0:38 Intro
1:17 Commonwealth Notice of Disclosure
13:20 David Yanetti Statement On Commonwealths Notice of Disclosure
15:42 Q&A
18:14 Defense Motion – Third Supplemental Memorandum
23:26 Q&A
25:22 David Yanetti Affidavit
28:05 Q&A
29:55 Yanetti Affidavit Cont.
32:40 Q&A
42:55 Conclusion

🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a personal injury or wrongful death case? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727) 441-9030 or email us at [email protected].

✅ For business inquiries contact me at [email protected]
✅ Let’s connect:
Twitter – @LawyerYouKnow
Instagram – @tragoslaw
Facebook – @LawyerYouKnow
TikTok – @LawyerYouKnow
✅ Join our email list here –

✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here –

✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here –

*SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER – 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2. Questions are answered on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction.*

🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE
lawyers near me , LIVE! Is The Commonwealth Dropping Counts 1 & 3? What Did The Jurors Tell Them?

Tags

42 thoughts on “LIVE! Is The Commonwealth Dropping Counts 1 & 3? What Did The Jurors Tell Them?”

  1. Just let Karen Read go and let her move on with her life.

    The cops need to focus on the real killer of what’s his name, her boyfriend.

  2. Lally allowed a false evidence on trial. The video inverted. The false hair, the fake glass in the bumper, the 45 pieces of a tail light etc They didn’t want justice the just pointing to an innocent person. The DA should all be fired. Presenting false evidence it’s a crime! By the way Lally you are the most boring person in the planet that talks for hours without saying anything. What if anything, you repeat this 300 million times. There’s something wrong with you, you need to learn to speak. You don’t get your point across besides lying on evidence it’s very immoral. DA it’s not your calling you have to have integrity morals respect to the law. Just find another job.

  3. This is NOT a search for truth and justice it is a competition and Lalley and Judge are looking for a WIN via a guilty verdict or to bankrupt her and destroy her mentally. Judge gave ONE hr for a 2 month trial for closing? The recent “ballerina” trial was a week and got a hour. Bev not wanting to bother jurors, you wasted 2 months, Jackson said the charge # 2 instructions were BS and where was the problem? 2nd charge.
    Only thing going forward is for every single charge and each lesser included: write in number of jurors, # must add up to 12 guilty, not guilty. Ie 9 guilty, 3 not guilty. This would prevent confusion like this and Bev I DONT CARE IF MA HAS DONE IT THIS WAY FOR YEARS, it obviously does NOT always work! Justice before EGO 😡😡😡

  4. I still find it hilarious the brother of the deceased sides with the very people that killed him.

  5. It's wrong for the jury not to be heard. Commonweath knows exactly what they are doing. They have intimidated these jurors!

  6. You need to regularly cover the Delphi case. It's a case within a case with the human rights violations… it's far more interesting than your average murder. Please cover it more! ❤

  7. What does it say about you if a jury of your peers is low IQ? What does it say about your justice system? Hard to believe Americans brag about it.

  8. Is true Raffery owned a Ford Edge? I was watching one young girl talking about the Karen Read case and she talked about Raffery hitting an old man with a cane with her ford edge ( Mystery SVU)

  9. They’re not dropping anything. There’s a better chance she’s tried a third time before the CW does anything remotely sane.

  10. Thank you this great video. 😁😘🫠🫠😁😘😘😄😆😄😘😆😁😘😆😉😜😆😉😆🤪😉😆🤪🤪😉😆🤪😉😆😉😆🤪😆🤪😉😜😆🫠😁😄😘😃😁😘😁😜🫠😁😜🫠😁😜🫠😜🫠😁😁😜🫠🫠😜😁 ixti gi gitx7rxu fig

  11. John O'Keefe was not struck by a vehicle, therefore Karen Read did not hit him. It's really that straightforward. Their own experts had reasonable doubts that he could have been hit by a car, so how can a jury claim there are no other ways John O'Keefe could have died that night? What the manslaughter charge means is that they believe Karen Read hit him with her car and he died as the result of that collision, and they cannot think of any other possible ways his death could have occurred that night. That's dishonest.

    The physics of what the CW is claiming do not work. John wasn't struck by a car, and certainly didn't get flung 30' after being hit in the arm. The evidence doesn't prove anything the CW is saying.

  12. If the FBI finds there was procedural corruption by the State Police and Canton Police can Karen Read be reimbursed for legal fees spent defending herself.

  13. The jurors could have been dissecting the words in count two about did Read’s actions cause the result of harm/death to OKeefe. They may have been taking that literally being that indeed she dropped him off which would not have resulted in his death if she hadn’t. That second charge doesn’t specifically say that she hit him with her car that caused harm/death. Instead it is very vague.

  14. PETER I forgot to ask you if there has been any legit research that says that there are more convictions with just 6 jurors? Also, I think the jurors reached out to cw 1st and when they were blown off they went to the def lawyers.

  15. Im shocked… everyone involved deleted phones but the snow plow driver with absolutely nothing vested in this case.. says he doesn’t see him when plowing BUT did see another vehicle parked right where the body was?

  16. When I am selected for jury duty I vote innocent and never waver. Unless the defendant was harming children, elderly or disabled.
    But the last 5 times I’ve walked in the courthouse knowing the person is innocent of all charges and never back down.

  17. What the 9 jurors who voted MS. That proves without a doubt that you are letting real Dummies decide your fate.
    The fact that it’s Assachusetts makes it a lil easier to believe because it’s the second worst state in the country but man there has to be an IQ test or something to prove that you can handle being a jury.
    9 morons..one ring leader loud and proud and 8 followers because that’s what they do best…

  18. I really believe the jurors did not find Karen innocent on manslaughter, is because of all the lies. Lally’s 60 so called witnesses, which the prosecution Lied and called some of them Experts. Which was another Lie. Lally tried so hard to confuse the Jurors. They couldn’t hear very well causing information to be missed. They also couldn’t see the body language from Lally’s 60 groupies. There’s a lot of reasons the manslaughter charge had some wanting to believe that. I don’t think that will happen again!

  19. Greetings from Utah! Thank you so much for being the only atty that I can listen to without having to search the subject in question I'm asking about!

  20. Anty bev had the right to ask the jurors without getting anyone involved
    BUT She made them involved And used them. Ofcourse the jurors can be asked without cameras in their face.

  21. They are going to recharge her and if she is found guilty, they are going to search a higher courts opinion and then all charges will be dropped and all this time and money would have been wasted. Let it go Lally!!

  22. The Jurors didn’t know, like we did, that the FBI/DOJ were the ones who said “Johns injuries WERE NOT made by a car! Or just how crooked the cops are.

  23. I don’t think the jurors would have a problem coming in off camera to meet with the judge and attorneys.

  24. Lally threatening the Jurors, without threatening them! He doesn’t want justice and he is a joke. But…we all already knew that.

  25. It is absolutely unconscionable that the prosecution is effectively ignoring valid juror concerns and statements. The prosecution is balking at something that the jjurors aren’t even asking… which is to “talk about their deliberations”. The jurors are just seeking to let BOTH sides know that the jury was unanimous on NG for counts 1 and 3. What a fucking joke.

  26. Yep Peter you finally got it. The “coverup fell flat”, most jurors thought she DID hit him.

Comments are closed.