#Legal #Aptitude #CLAT8 #Criminal #Law1 #Fundamentals #Defenses #www.edusaathi.com
This video explains the fundamentals of Criminal Law from the viewpoint of CLAT & AILET. It also covers defenses used in Criminal Law & Some Specific Offences.
criminal law , Legal Aptitude for CLAT-8: Criminal Law-1 (Fundamentals & Defenses) | www.edusaathi.com, CLAT,Law after +2,SET,AILET,LA,LK,LR,legal reasoning,legal knowledge,legal aptitude,symbiosis,NLU,NLS,NALSAR,criminal intention,criminal knowledge,mens rea,actus rea,involuntary intoxication,self defence,private defense,theft,robbery,Common Law Admission Test
![Legal Aptitude for CLAT-8: Criminal Law-1 (Fundamentals & Defenses) | www.edusaathi.com](https://en.erudisi.com/wp-content/uploads/https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TY7nsMGJSdY/maxresdefault.jpg)
Tags
actus rea, AILET, CLAT, Common Law Admission Test, criminal intention, criminal knowledge, criminal law, criminal lawyer, involuntary intoxication, LA, Law after +2, Legal Aptitude, legal knowledge, Legal Reasoning, LK, LR, mens rea, NALSAR, NLS, nlu, private defense, robbery, self-defence, SET, symbiosis, theft
You have best teaching style and your explanation or examples to..
If you had teach this in hindi than this is going to be wonderful and best legal aptitude playlist on youtube
Mam what u had told in motive
This sentence
Man can u explain my doubts
Plz make videos in Hindi
Thnku mam
mam thank you so much all of your videos are awesome i just want to ask that after watching your videos can we solve previous years legal questions or anything extra to study?
do we need to learn these sections also which hold these situations.please reply #edusathi
In the last question, being in the Sales Tax Department has absolutely no relation to that person buying a television as a customer on an instalment basis, which B agreed because he thought he was special, and that B would get a favorable assessment out of it, the question is whether A was a normal person would B have done the same ? It's B's fault to let go of that TV on an instalment which he otherwise could have easily took the whole money in the first place and then in return gave that Television to B just like what a normal seller-buyer relation would be. Not even that A gave the first instalment, B committed a big blunder by not asking for any security as well, thinking that he was from the Sales Tax Department he let him go. What rubbish.
Nice,….
Thnx