Video

Karen Read Judge Scolds Lawyers for Finger-Pointing, Name-Calling in Murder Trial

En


#Karen #Read #Judge #Scolds #Lawyers #FingerPointing #NameCalling #Murder #Trial

The judge presiding over Karen Read’s murder trial scolded both the Commonwealth prosecutor and defense attorney for their continuous finger-pointing and name-calling. Judge Beverly Cannone told both sides to quit attacking each other and to continue respectfully. Both the prosecutor and defense apologized to the court.

Subscribe to Law&Crime Trials for More Courtroom Coverage:
More Karen Read Courtroom Coverage:

Karen Read faces several charges including second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol, and leaving the scene of personal injury and death. She was arrested in February of 2022, a few days after John O’Keefe died. If convicted, Read faces life in prison.

#KarenRead #MurderTrial #LawAndCrime

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV:
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network:
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter:
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network:

For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: [email protected]

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram:
Twitter:
Facebook:
Twitch:
TikTok:

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS:

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel:
Law&Crime Shorts:
Channel B:
Channel C:
lawyers near me , Karen Read Judge Scolds Lawyers for Finger-Pointing, Name-Calling in Murder Trial

Tags

29 thoughts on “Karen Read Judge Scolds Lawyers for Finger-Pointing, Name-Calling in Murder Trial”

  1. Just watch Johns brother and Mom.His brother watches them like a hawk I sure hope he isnt buying Krazy Karens BS! Id love to see his brother tell that Jackson and Judge off I know he cant but Id love it!! That judge allows that circus outside this is SO like OJ Simpson again like I said waiting on Krazy karen to write the book (if) I did it part two

  2. I find the defenses position about evidence ridiculous. "didn't have time to prepare." That sounds like "we didn't have time to come up with some sort of excuse.

  3. 6:09 Even if the taillight wasn’t cracked….no way would it have done all that damage to John’s body! This is a joke

  4. If anyone creates a petition to disbar this judge PLEASE let us know. I will be more than happy to sign. She’s a disgrace!

  5. The judge IS the problem. Let justice play out. Get out of your own way. This isn't about you Judge.

  6. Hes fabuloso.Bev…that sligh smile of yours to the jury every morning..your a aunty to the whole police force kids …..leave Karen out you know the truth Kangaroo court.

  7. She killed him in a classic case of road rage DUI, yet the case is a dog and pony show that goes on for weeks. Gives a whole new meaning to the DUI!

  8. Auntie bev let's prosc. Witnesses drone on while constantly curtailing defence, really should have moved trial out of 'drunk cop town'.

  9. One of the few judges from america that stiill show humanity in treating those in this trial equal – but to few like her !!!!!! Becoming like Lot's question to spare Sodomites and Gomorre's that continually breaks love patterns

  10. someone got dead and well why would the cops kill their own and leave a body on a cops property and 7 drinks to the wind, and well….

  11. Actor Alan cant use his mental monologues on scientists he lets spaghetti do the cross on those witnesses

  12. That has been endless proof of police misconduct and coverups. This is a slam dunk acquittal. Phone deletions, incriminating texts, an investigator caught helping the police, repeated “butt dials” at critical times, injuries with no connection to being hit by a car, dog bites, the dog was gotten rid of, the house quickly sold for under market value. Let alone no motive. There isn’t enough room here for me to add the other obvious points of why she is innocent. Now… for you knuckleheads posting that “Karen is guilty”, how about explaining a little bit why you think that? I watch these trial portions where they are home run victories for the defense and people are saying that she’s guilty. What about what you just watched made you come to that conclusion? It’s like watching the video of a man getting hit in the head with a baseball bat and then saying, “see! he didn’t get hit“

Comments are closed.