Video

“Far Worse Than Negligence” £170m Netflix Lawsuit DEFENDED by Fiona Harvey’s Lawyer

En


#Worse #Negligence #170m #Netflix #Lawsuit #DEFENDED #Fiona #Harveys #Lawyer

People could be forgiven for thinking the saga of Baby Reindeer would have petered out by now, but as Netflix’s side of the story continues to unravel, a legal firestorm has slowly coalesced in the State of California. Fiona Harvey’s US lawyer Richard Roth catches up with Piers Morgan to discuss their lawsuit against the streaming giant.

Roth discusses where the company may have gone wrong and also defends the eye-watering sum of $170m that they’re asking for, reminding viewers that as his client sits at home afraid to go out for groceries, Richard Gadd and Jessica Gunning continue their North American publicity tour.

00:00 – Introduction
01:01 – Richard Roth on why he took Fiona Harvey’s case
05:05 – Netflix negligence?
07:05 – Roth on Richard Gadd
11:05 – Is Fiona Harvey ‘innocent’?
12:55 – Why is she suing for $170 million dollars?
14:56 – Netflix’s defence
19:11 – Who has to prove their case?
20:29 – Update on Fiona
21:17 – How will this affect Hollywood?

Subscribe to stay up-to-date on all Uncensored content.

Follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on:
Twitter:
Instagram:
Facebook:
TikTok:

Follow Piers Morgan on:
Twitter:
Instagram:

#babyreindeer #martha #piersmorgan #interview #fionaharvey #netflix
lawyers near me , “Far Worse Than Negligence” £170m Netflix Lawsuit DEFENDED by Fiona Harvey’s Lawyer

Tags

23 thoughts on ““Far Worse Than Negligence” £170m Netflix Lawsuit DEFENDED by Fiona Harvey’s Lawyer”

  1. I think they didn’t need to say true story and still would’ve made good money as it brought to public attention a reality of stalking and help the victims of it in society . I think he did it for revenge because although they both are damaged people she is an absolute nutcase.

  2. Lawyer literally said them putting in the credits that it’s fictionalized means nothing.

    Buddy go back to law school your brain is literally cooked. They won’t pay a cent. You are going to die an embarrassment to your professional colleagues lololol

  3. Piers you lost what little credibility you had with this. You’re so blatantly biased. Disgusting individual.

  4. It’s normal for a comedian to exaggerate parts of true stories. It would be weird if he didn’t. He’s not experienced as a strictly factual non-fiction storyteller.

  5. "We've seen nothing NEAR 41k emails". Why didn't Piers then ask "how many HAVE you seen?" 🤨 That statement makes her lawyer sound as cagey as she sounds.

  6. This interview is beyond ridiculous!!
    Even though you have a very mentally disturbed person harassing 2 separate people in a terrifying way. You now have scavengers that are trying to make money from it and turning a blind eye to some despicable behaviour.
    Wow! $$$$$$$$$

  7. The ultimate bullying move, sue everybody. Well she didn't sue Gadd, just Netflix. they have the money. Fiona is in heaven right now.

  8. Piers. Shut the hell up. You bring in an expert and basically says everything your guest has been brought on to say, leaving your guest just to repeat it all, just making you look knowledgable and informed. You may as well just go on a 10-minute rant, let’s face it, your ‘questions’ alone take 5 minutes to spew out your gob.

  9. I feel for Richard Gadd I think everyone around him took advantage of him. He made a brave attempt to open up to what he has been through. Honest about, what he felt was his mistakes. Netflix didn't do him any favours. This is why victims can not come forward in any circumstances because they will always become the target. And judged for their past or lifestyle. But it will be shown the people that make money out of people's worst times of their lives

  10. You seem to be swaying to Fiona’s side may I point couple things out the DBS check Roth has is a basic one go look at her advanced DBS check it includes spent convictions . Also Roth guy says Gadds was to get a peep at fame. Have you looked up the shows he’s been in including outlander before baby reindeer No one mentions his success before reindeer

  11. It makes me laugh Piers Morgan is famous for peddling lies when he was the editor of the Daily Mirror putting British soldiers lives at risk. He’s a fine one to talk. People have short memories.

    Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan was sacked last night as the newspaper's board finally accepted that pictures purporting to show British soldiers abusing an Iraqi prisoner were fakes.

    Mr Morgan's position had become untenable after an extraordinary news conference yesterday afternoon at which the Queen's Lancashire Regiment (QLR) demonstrated the "overwhelming evidence" showing that the photographs were "staged" in an army truck of a kind not used by the regiment in Iraq.

    "It is time the ego of one editor is measured against the life of a soldier," declared former commanding officer Col David Black as the regiment demanded an apology from the Mirror, branded Mr Morgan "a petty tyrant" and invited him to "consider his position." With the rival Sun newspaper offering a £50,000 reward for evidence leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible for the fake pictures, the QLR accused Mr Morgan of unjustly sullying its reputation and endangering the lives of British troops in Iraq.

    And within hours the Board of Trinity Mirror issued a statement accepting that the paper had been the subject of the biggest press hoax since the Hitler Diaries.

  12. They create a problem, wait for a reaction, the impliment their already planned solution.
    Its all a pantomime

  13. Why should they have to change if she’s Scottish to not hurt a serial stalkers reputation as long as they didn’t use any photos of her or her name or similar name then what is the problem

Comments are closed.