Video

EP#112 | What People Don’t Know About Criminal Law

En

EP#112 | What People Don’t Know About Criminal Law


#EP112 #People #Dont #Criminal #Law

Criminal Defence Lawyer Joseph Neuberger and legal researcher and host of the UnTrue Crime podcast Diana Davison, sit down and discuss the aftermath of their trials and the emerging and alarming changes to our legal system. A behind the scenes inside look into real courtroom drama.

Website:
Sign up to our email list –

Social Media Links
Twitter:
Instagram:
TikTok:
Facebook:
Telegram:
Minds:

Audio Platforms
Spotify:
Apple Podcasts:
SoundCloud:
Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/podcast/notonrecord
Google Play:

Video Platforms
Bitchute:
Rumble:

For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP

Produced by Benjamin Dichter & Max Silverberg

#notonrecord #law #lawyers
criminal lawyer , EP#112 | What People Don’t Know About Criminal Law, Diana Davison,Criminal defence,True Crime,Legal,law,podcast

12 thoughts on “EP#112 | What People Don’t Know About Criminal Law”

  1. Except that case on the eadt coasr where the uber driver claimed the super drunk girl told the driver befire she passed out that he could screw her brains out and the judge went along with it. Of course, the real.mitigating facotr was the guy was Muslim. It's the u realize all these excessive rules are to ensure conviction of certain individuals a d not others. In short, it's 100% political. If you're a White male yall goin' down bros! If not, well, hey, we have a host of ezcuses and double standards at our disposal to ensure you're conviction!

  2. The Ghomeshi trial made the crown and the accusers look like idiots, on public tv. They have put procedures in place to make sure it happens less often.

  3. Forgive my Niavite' but police are obligated to conduct a thorough investigation. Failure to do so infringes the rights of the accused to equal benefit and protection under the law and the right to not be Arbitrarily Detained.

  4. It is hard for me to relate to what you do with my experience. I guess there is so much difference between Canada and the US. It seems that your trials are a gentleman's battle of wits between worthy opponents and may the best man win. Personally, I think the lowest form of life on the planet is prosecutors. My experience is they will lie, hide exculpatory evidence, coach witnesses and their two favorite strategies, run to the media to poison the jury pool and the last resort, the jailhouse "confession" their favorite snitch just happens to hear. The problem here is too many people either think they are obliged to answer cop's questions or they can talk their way out of an arrest. I have told my friends so many times SHUT THE F UP. Do not answer their questions. Even that requires nuance because the Supreme Court has ruled that silence isn't enough. You have to affirmatively announce you will not answer questions. How many people who don't live and breath law know that? You have to start developing your defense as soon as the cop walks up because too many people destroy their own case before they are even arrested. And when you say lawyers don't have influence. Wrong. If you are looking at serious time you want the best lawyer you can get, and you want that lawyer to know the prosecutors and judges because if you are down to a plea bargain, that bargain will be based on how hard the prosecutor thinks convicting you will be. If you have a lawyer they don't respect they will not offer anything you can live with. I could go on but the differences seem to be night and day.

  5. Normally advance consent shouldn't be a problem in BDSM because it's standard to have a safeword.

Comments are closed.