Defense Opening Statement: MA v Karen Read, Killer or Cover-Up Murder Trial

40 thoughts on “Defense Opening Statement: MA v Karen Read, Killer or Cover-Up Murder Trial”

1. #CourtTV Catch up on the case against Karen Read.
   MORE HERE: https://www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=comment

2. Wow!! How did this case ever make it to court with Karen Reid as the suspect?

3. Can someone explain how or why they totally ignored the Judges order and opened with the 3rd party she was framed theory???

   Below is the Judges instructions before the trial.
   "I'm going to give you a chance to develop it through relevant, competent, admissable evidence," she said. "But you cannot open with it."

   Then the Defense ignores it and does the opposite they open with the "She was framed theory.

   Court TV seems baffled by this and has no discussion let alone a answer. Does court TV way for bloggers to do their work and answer this simple question? If they did answer it does anyone have a link?

4. All prosecution parties including the judge should be investigated and sued into oblivion…lose everything…including their freedom. Pre-trial conduct by the judge and prosecution was ridiculous. This case should never been brought…however, a real investigation should have been done. And that is why Karen Read was framed. The perfect scapegoat so investigation wouldn't look at the most obvious suspects. Disgusting behavior. The Massachusetts legal community should be embarrassed and horrified by this. But sham trials are becoming pretty popular these days. Yannetti and Jackson are going to expose the truth for this jury.

5. Not a convincing opening statement from the defense.

6. This is how an opening statement should be! Bravo! Plus it doesn’t help that his client is innocent.

7. framed, please I'm not buying it

8. If the state is reading these comments and I hope they are….I would quit while you’re behind I know I said that saying wrong, and I did it on purpose. Bringing charges against this women even if she did do it after what I just heard your detective ruined any chances of proving it.

9. I totally believe this women was framed by this cops who beat her boyfriend and wanted to blame it on the wife. Because that is always the case, is classic police new and old tactics. How can they sleep at night knowing the killers are free???

10. What’s a Prime drink doing in that Courtroom?

    ….free advertisement right there!

11. I wonder why they would set up a Karen 😂

12. Excellent job Counselor!

13. How did this get to trial???!!! So much reasonable doubt its insane.

14. This is worse than the Leticia Stauch defense. I actually gave them the benefit of the doubt for a short period of time. Boy did I regret that.

15. The jurors are going to the crime scene so I don't know why Yanetti is lying that the body was "just feet" from the house.

16. Turtle Riders are all over this case.

17. This is an O.J. Simpson defense.

18. I do not know if Karen is responsible for this officer’s death 😢. But something I am certain of is that the O’Keefes have been through hell! They have been through so much! Consider them first! They are the priority here.

19. Corruption breeds incompetence and vice versa.

20. the courtroom must be small, the victims sitting so close to defendant 😳

21. the courtroom must be small, the victims sitting so close to defendant 😳

22. Anyone else notice the older gentleman in the red, white, and blue windbreaker behind the attorney? He has been sleeping on and off the entire time. 😂

23. 37:29 for the mother of the victim to mouth "nope" along with the defense lawyer. If all this is true, Boston Police is gross.

24. Crooked cops are for real people

25. Karen is Smoke❤🎉

26. It was a botched investigation. It has to be dismissed.

27. Scratches on his arm how could he get those if he had layers of clothing on how could she hit him if he was on the lawn cars don’t ride lawns and if she actually backed up, she would have been on a street correct to back up he wasn’t found on the streetthey don’t have enough evidence to convict her. I believe she didn’t kill him. They don’t have enough proof to convict her of killing her boyfriend, especially doing it on purpose definitely not.

28. He summed it up and gave us a review.

29. Opening defense rocked

30. I don’t feel she necessarily looks smug. Just confident that she’s innocent. But I’m still watching so maybe I’ll see something upcoming

31. This is disgraceful! I can see why so many people are supporting Karen . I had no idea there was so much corruption in this “ investigation “ . Free her now …

32. She is so guilty

33. Good defence

34. Ok so if his body was pristine then he didn’t take much of a beating in the house either did he?

35. That’s all you can hear is the fat judges squeaking chair

36. Who would want to see nudes of that old witch?

37. Why would she ask “did I hit him”? If she saw him go into the house? She’s a liar

38. People driving by the courthouse beeping 😂

39. She’s innocent🥰

40. Boston Strong

Comments are closed.