Video

Criminal Law Revised Penal Code (RPC) Art. 4 Criminal Liability

En

Criminal Law Revised Penal Code (RPC) Art. 4 Criminal Liability


#Criminal #Law #Revised #Penal #Code #RPC #Art #Criminal #Liability

Hi everyone!

This video covers Art. 4 of the RPC in re Criminal Liability.

Plus we will also discuss 3 important subtopics under Art. 4 which are error in personae, aberratio ictus, and praeter intentionem.

Good luck!

Study hard. Pray harder.

Sources: RPC by Luis B. Reyes, Ortega Notes, Laws and Jurisprudence

Related videos:

criminal law , Criminal Law Revised Penal Code (RPC) Art. 4 Criminal Liability, criminal law,revised penal code,rpc,art. 4,criminal liability,error in personae,praeter intentionem,aberratio ictus

21 thoughts on “Criminal Law Revised Penal Code (RPC) Art. 4 Criminal Liability”

  1. Atty bat sa praeter intentionem di nag apply ang Art 49 na gagamitin ang penalty na lower? bakit mitgating lang? salamat

  2. hi po law student po ako, ganda po ng mga videos nyo po madali ma intindihan ang explanation sana po continue nyo po pag gawa ng videos hopefully sa criminal law 2 po. salamat po.

  3. Sir Yung example NYO po na Yung victim natakot tumalon tapos nalunod Hindi po ba efficient intervening cause Yun?

  4. Thank you so much po Atty. I'm a second year criminology studentband today is our midterm examination po. This is so helpful, mas naiintindihan ko po lalo ♡

  5. Hi Atty! Regarding the last example you provided, where the doctrine of proximate cause will not apply. Hindi po ba si Pedro magiging liable and hindi po ba pasok yung example sa “he who is the cause of the cause is the cause of the evil caused”?

    Hoping for your response po. Thank you ❤

  6. Hindi po ba intervening yung willfulness of the victim not to go to the hospital? kasi pag nagpahospital sya mabubuhay sya.

  7. Thankk you atty.
    What if sinaksak ni Juan si Pedro sa braso .. tapos si Pedro naligo sa maduming ilog tapos na infect yung sugat niya then namatay syaa? Maapply po ba yung Proximate Cause Doctrine?

  8. DATE: JULY 1, 2022 TIME: 7:00AM IT'S OBVIOUS, MARCO LORENZO LOBREGAT WHO OWNS DON PABLO LORENZO MEMORIAL HIGHSCHOOL ZAMBOANGA CITY IS NOT AFTER MY WEALTH FROM THE BEGINNING. IT'S OBVIOUS, ALEC ARENAS WHO OWNS A MCDONALD'S FRANCHISE IS NOT AFTER MY WEALTH FROM THE BEGINNING. THE LLUSTRISSIMO FAMILY BACKGROUND USED FLORENTINO S SUSALO III WHO IS OBVIOUSLY A LESS FORTUNATE. THE LLUSTRISSIMO FAMILY BACKGROUND DID THAT PERVERT CONCEPT APPROACH WITHOUT MY PERSONAL CONCENT. THE LLUSTRISSIMO FAMILY BACKGROUND DID A IMMORTAL ACTION. ALL MY LAWSCHOOL CLASSMATES KNOWS MARCO LORENZO LOBREGAT RESPECTED ME SINCE YEAR 2008 AND COURTED ME DECENTLY SINCE YEAR 2008. HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING INDECENT TOWARDS ME. ALEC ARENAS RESPECTED ME FROM THE BEGINNING. TIME: 7:03AM "LOUIE LLUSTRISSIMO IS STUPID" I'M HONEST ♥️ TIME: 7:04AM

  9. DATE: JULY 1, 2022 TIME: 6:52AM I WOULD HAD BEEN A SUCCESSFUL LAWYER BY NOW. I'M STILL STUDYING. THE COLLECTION OF THE TAX COULD NOT HAVE RESERVED IN THE CRIMINAL CASE BECAUSE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IS NOT WITHIN THE REMEDIES IN THE LAW FOR THE COLLECTION OF THE TAX (PEOPLE V. ARNAULT , L-4288, NOVEMBER 20, 1952. INDEED CIVIL LIABILITY IS NOT DEEMED INCLUDED IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE PERVERT CONCEPT APPROACH FROM THE LLUSTRISSIMO FAMILY BACKGROUND IS CONSIDERED A CRIME. IT'S NOT WITHIN MY PERSONAL CONCENT. LOUIE LLUSTRISSIMO IS NOT MY TYPE FROM THE BEGINNING. HE IS DISGUSTING. TIME: 6:58AM

Comments are closed.