Criminal defense attorney speaks on potential next steps in Karen Read murder case

43 thoughts on “Criminal defense attorney speaks on potential next steps in Karen Read murder case”

1. How many $’s did the DA spend on this miss trial ?

2. If the case is tried again, will the prosecution be putting Proctor on the stand?

3. Even with the new prosecutor…yenetti and jackson will say …let them come…quote by optimus prime

4. Between the TRUE expert FBI witnesses saying that science does NOT allow ANY scenario where O'Keefe could have been killed by Karen Reed's car, PLUS ALL the lying, deceiving, deleting & forging almost every main prosecution witness was caught in under examination should ATLEAST point to reasonable doubt but in reality should show she was innocent. This shows that these jurors, like the rest of the town, is DIRTY or how intellectually dishonest those jurors were. The whole town being dirty apparently doesn't just happen in the movies.

5. He was beat to a pulp in the house, carried to a car, and dropped in the snow by the people in the house.

6. We all know there are people unwilling to look at the evidence given because they are incapable of thinking law enforcement commit any crimes or they deny there are corrupt cops!

7. Renee, the jury did follow the evidence and the prosecution FAILED, cops FAILED, and it sounds like you are the one with ‘emotions’ regarding outcome. Are you pals with any of the losers?

8. Prosecutors failed to realize the interest in crime cases on tv, in movies and on YouTube. Everybody knows the cops are a gang that protects itself from outside scrutiny, and what happened, just that! We all knew the investigation was tainted, no search of the house, blood scooped up in solo cup, phones dumped in violation of orders, aggressive dog gone, bites on arm, back of head & eye damaged, snow plow driver, etc. WTF

9. Claim they are going to have a re-trial to save face now but they will kick it down the road and hope it will be forgotten about along with the police corruption!

10. How can these people think he was hit by a car??

11. Can't go back to square 1… 😂😂😂 Can't undo this entire trial. Good luck to the prosecution finding a jury that havn't watched and seen all this. Ain't gonna happen. There isn't going to be a retrial.

12. People need to understand NOT a win for State nor Karen Read; State didn't get a conviction and Defense didn't get Karen OFF. Get rid of any dirty cops I say as a backer of the "blue" imo whether Read is guilty or not guilty.
    
    The sad thing is John O'Keefe is dead and no one yet has punished for his death.

13. Agree at the outset it was snowing and move on from that!

14. Morrisey didn’t jump the gun. He leaped to shout out retrial faster than the speed of sound. Im disgusted with the Norfolk County DA. I’m hoping the federal investigation once it concludes , is the game changer that acquitts Karen Read.

15. I’m sure the CW will try the case again, they were probably shocked they did so “well” just as the majority of the public was!

16. But I thought the jury note said they were " Deeply divided"

17. I can see Paul O'keefe suing Karen civvily on behalf of the children . Burden is much lower.
    Paul O'keef who caused a catastrophic rta wilst DUI which seriousky injured an elderly man. Guess who bailed him out? Karen.

18. There's no explanation possible about the jury members who were on the guilty side, except that they were strongly biased to the police community or against KR, other than they were plain idiots. No sane, normal person starting in the neutral mindset could have looked at the evidence and testimonies and not see a mountain of reasonable doubt. Take away the names, genders, origins and professions of people involved and look at just the evidence, there is no proof the victim was actually hit by a car, and plenty of evidence to the contrary. I've never seen a judge try to railroad a conviction in any trial, this was a first and it was shockingly obvious. I wonder how the judge and the jury siding with guilty feels today after seeing the breaking news of Proctor being rehomed, just like the dog Chloe. Essentially, those jurors stood by a vote of confidence in the lead investigator by trusting his testimony, which to anyone with eyes was a stinky pile of BS. That the state police waited for the end of the trial to announce this is just another sign of how deep their manipulation of the community they serve is inbedded into that system. This is not a good look for the whole justice system in that state, seems they go by "guilty 'til proven innocent" there and they'll do anything to uphold that.

19. It has to be retried. It's a cop who died. Someone did it.

20. the case was not complicated at all. 2 FBI witnesses testified that he was not killed by a car.

21. Karen has a Killer Jawline 🔪

22. This investigation was so biased and botched right from the beginning. It’s not fair to Karen at all. It should be dismissed. Her rights have been violated because of the way they did this investigation.

23. CW was corrupt!

24. Always enjoy hearing from Peter Elikann!

25. Already, people that really believed she wasn't guilty, are anxiously waiting for the FBI to come out and say, she is innocent and no retrial. However, if there is a retrial, the pink shirt club will be saying…the FBI is in on the conspiracy as well. What a joke.

26. Hour by hour the state's case for a re-trial gets more mountainous.

27. This whole trial was a joke. Both sides asked for a continence. They had so many breaks and half days. The courtroom setup was ridiculous. How are jurors supposed to keep up.

28. Advantage to the defense!

29. The jurors were suppose to follow the EVIDENCE! Not go off their emotions period!

30. Here in the Netherlands, our law school students and professors are happy with this outcome. This case was frazzled on all sides. We don't know if she is guilty, but we also don't know if the Albert's are guilty. All because of poor investigation, bias, and many false facts.

31. AND MY EX, IS A DRUNK, COP, SO YEAH, THEY GET DRUNK
    LIE, GET VIOLENT ETC.. RECORDINGS OF HIM DRUNK PURE, TOM FOOLERY!

32. Corrupt like BEXAR COUNTY,TX COURTS. DO COVER UP, FOR DIRTY COPS, MY EX IS DIRTY COP, THEY NEED THEM FOR OTHER CASES! I RECORDED HIM GOT PROOF! OVER 30 AND VIDEO, STALKING ME 2 DIFFERENT TRUCKS! THEY REFUSE TO STOP HIM & HIS SEXUAL HARASSMENT, PERV CALLS!

33. lol This channel is messing with the dislikes. They are getting ratioed and don't want you to know.

34. And notice, NBC doesn't dare to identify this 'defence attorney'. I'm guessing he attends Jen McCabe's swinger parties. Amazing that the average Joe understands the law better than these guys do. Why would anyone pay these treacherous PoS's to speak for them in court?

35. Cops murder cop and frame the girlfriend. Strange that NBC would leave that part out. Hacks.

36. Lally crew are so wrong is it because they know all the real guilty ones which isn't Karen Reed my opinion thanks 😊😊

37. They all say they will retrial. To save face. Let’s see

38. It would be a waste of time to retry. They won’t get a conviction in this tainted case

39. This attorney was always bias. He can not give a objective outcome. He was always for Karen Read and she was clearly guilty

40. a jury of your peers …not unanimous should end trials….that's why we have jury's where is the justice the constitution is clear she should be done with this allegation

41. If this guy has ties to you people on NBC then he is not trustworthy PERIOD.

42. Don't forget the federal investigation against the prosecution and witnesses

43. What were the guilty votes?

Comments are closed.