Are Police Required to do a Defence Investigation? #shorts

11 thoughts on “Are Police Required to do a Defence Investigation? #shorts”

1. One of the many reasons our court system is so packed. If the police would do an actual investigation before pressing charges, a lot of cases would never even make it to a grand jury, let alone a hearing. They aren't going to arrest you for murder and put you on trial without an investigation and the belief that there's enough evidence to possibly convict, but when it comes to misdemeanors, they'll just book you and assign you a court date without a second thought.

2. NO Attorney IN HISTORY ever said "Oh thank god my client gave a statement to police when I was NOT present" why? BECAUSE YOU SHOULD NEVER SAY ANYTHING WITHOut YOUR ATTORNEY PRESENT!!!

3. And this is everything wrong with the world we live in. Used to be a requirement back in the day to have some kind of proof. Aka, where the constitution comes in, stating innocent till proven guilty. Ben Franklin said, "It is better a hundred guilty persons should escape than one innocent person should suffer."

4. This is the bs america wants to export to the rest of rhe world as policing?

5. FTP

6. So much for "innocent until proven guilty"..

7. Okay, I AM gonna be critical.
   Is their goal conviction percentage, or JUSTICE ?!?

8. Unfortunately we changed the caution in the UK and added "it may harm your defence if you do not say something now that you later rely on in court. In other words you don't have to say anything but best you do. Bloody nonsense

9. Never make a statement without your attorney. Under no circumstances !!

10. Exactly what happened to me. But the judge was awesome, she actually looked at the prosecutor and said" so if you had made 1 phone call you could have save all of us here from waiting our time?" Xase dismissed with prejudice

11. What’s the difference between cops and mafioso these days?

Comments are closed.