#conversation #Employment #Defense #Compliance #Attorney #Eric #Sarver #Part
Special thanks to attorney Eric Sarver! Make sure to follow him:
Website: www.sarver-law.com
LinkedIn: www.ericsarver.com
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SarverLawFirmPLLC
The Merch:
I do track the comments on these videos and I try to respond within 24 hours so please feel free to reach out but be careful not to share identifying information about yourself on this publicly viewable forum.
Consider hitting the like and subscribe buttons or even just commenting down below, doing so helps me to help more people just like you.
You can obtain additional information about our firm here:
You can see our cases in the press here:
And you can find us on facebook here:
Everybody works – but not everybody wins.
Some jurisdictions may consider this attorney advertising, although advertising is not the intent of these videos.
If you have a question about employment law, workplace discrimination or sexual harassment please do not hesitate to contact us. We will try to craft a video response for you, or where more appropriate we are happy to have a private conversation.
This answer does not constitute legal advice and you should contact an attorney to confirm or research further any statements made in this answer. Any statements of fact or law I have made in this answer pertain solely to Federal law as construed within the EEOC or the laws of New York State and should not be relied upon in any way in any other jurisdiction.
lawyers near me , A conversation with Employment Defense and Compliance Attorney Eric Sarver, Part 1:
Im suing my former employer avi for firing me while i was on intermittent fmla. They also forced me to work excess my hourly restrictions. There was also harassment. Its pretty obvious. My lawyer said realistically looking between 50 to 100k from the lawsuit. If he is confident enough to give a settlement amount should i realistically expect that?
Interesting the mention of Chevron because of pre recorded and now what would he sight???
Thanks @Law Office of Vincent P. White for posting this important video! The Supreme Court recently made a decision on Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. Wanna know what the key facts are? Here is a summary:
A group of commercial fishermen who regularly participate in the Atlantic herring fishery sued the National Marine Fisheries Service after the Service promulgated a rule that required industry to fund at-sea monitoring programs at an estimated cost of $710 per day. The fisherman argued that the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 did not authorize the Service to create industry-funded monitoring requirements and that the Service failed to follow proper rulemaking procedure.
The district court granted summary judgment for the government based on its reasonable interpretation of its authority and its adoption of the rule through the required notice-and-comment procedure. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed.
Thanks @Law Office of Vincent P. White for posting this important video! The Supreme Court recently made a decision on Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. Wanna know what the key facts are? Here is a summary:
A group of commercial fishermen who regularly participate in the Atlantic herring fishery sued the National Marine Fisheries Service after the Service promulgated a rule that required industry to fund at-sea monitoring programs at an estimated cost of $710 per day. The fisherman argued that the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 did not authorize the Service to create industry-funded monitoring requirements and that the Service failed to follow proper rulemaking procedure.
The district court granted summary judgment for the government based on its reasonable interpretation of its authority and its adoption of the rule through the required notice-and-comment procedure. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed.
Sarver said the FTC or the NLRB made a "ruling," and Vince referred to an FTC "holding." Sarver and Vince need to clarify those statements. Executive branch agencies cannot make law. What exactly are we dealing with? Did this federal agency follow the correct procedure to establish a federal regulation?
Vince, Can you explain the limits related to number of employees and if all employees must be based/working in USA. If you are working for a subsidiary, do all employees across all entities count ?
The other side? Interesting.
Looking forward to this information.