💥Breaking💥Karen Read Juror files Emergency Petition Citing Fear of Harm💥5th juror comes forward💥

40 thoughts on “💥Breaking💥Karen Read Juror files Emergency Petition Citing Fear of Harm💥5th juror comes forward💥”

1. I dont like you or your channel. You sit aquarely in the middle of the fence and refuse to say or do anything to upset ANYONE. You are only doing that because you WANT MONEY. You WILL have to pick a side soon enough though.

2. Yes, 5 out of 12 jurors, keep coming forward in the name of justice. Thank you jurors. Karen is innocent. Just my opinion but if I was 1 of the jurors and lived locally I would certainly be intimidated by Brian Albert staring at the jurors

3. I question the intelligence of anyone who believes this woman's BS story that she was framed by the police in the face of all the evidence to the contrary… 💥

4. Until she gets paid for her story lol

5. Yep the land of the crazies! I predicted 3 years ago that our court system will be forever ruined due to social media and this current administration not arresting real criminals.

6. NETFLIX is doing a three part film on Karen Read…..Could this work to have Aunt Bev dismiss the case because she HATES media and cameras and doing interviews……..

7. Im sorry but this Juror affidavit is a sham of fear. Please just go and fact check in this affidavit this juror refers to a post that is on a deceased person's account posted 2 yrs ago that is nowhere in the algorithm unless you know where to find it. This means that either this juror has been lying about his/her knowledge about the case and has been researching for yrs, because their has not been enough time since the trial to unearth everything, or this is a juror that has been in contact with an involved party on the Alberts and McCabe's side. Its either that or this is a fake affidavit made up by the CW

8. Who will be first to release a documentary on this? Netflix? Hulu? Or will they go straight to a Lifetime movie? 🤔

9. Judge Bev " Massachusetts has always used this jury verdict form since the Salem Witch Trials and we don't have witches flying around anymore do we"

10. On the rewatch crew❤

11. I am on replay but in the motion it says she THOUGHT there were media there and she was being followed but it says that she was not being followed. I understand why they would fear but the way I understand it was not true that people were there and following this juror. Also, does anyone else remember the ONLY person who stated that FKR people were following the jury??? Grant Smith Ellis!!! The only one! That makes me believe that it was possibly the only one who knew about the possibility that someone followed the jury!! The ONLY people who have been physical have been the people who believe Karen Read is guilty! No one on in the FKR movement wants to know who the jury is- we just want to know what if anything they agreed on. This affidavit doesn’t even go to TB actual posts or videos of his but instead went to someone who is anti Karen Read who died back in May! 🤦🏼‍♀️. Why wouldn’t they just go straight to TB posts/videos?? All of it is strange. It really does make me wonder if they are afraid that someone may find a link where they shouldn’t have been on the jury?? Really makes me wonder.

12. You were doing the peace sign right the first time, I never knew there was a wrong way either until i googled it

13. DA Morrisey just raised his pay to $240,000……WT% is wrong there….

14. Will NETFLIX irritate Aunt Bev? She hates media……Could she dismiss the case and leave for The Cape?…..or worse….block any media or cameras from the courtroom…..

15. Lally brought 65 witnesses, including the Bermuda incident to confuse the jury, so they would forget or be confused about who said what.

16. Replay hear from rock springs WY….,…………….. Wm

17. I watched Alan Jackson stand up and ask the judge to put a 4th charge of NOT GUILTY. The judge said NO.

18. I bet auntie bev will be the judge. Bev loves to SUBTAIN SUBTAIN SUBTAIN SUBTAIN. SHE DOESN'T LIKE THE GREAT EVIDENCE. you know Lally was paid good. So much corruption and cover-up

19. Hello 🎉 Mel

20. Melanie the charges feel like a setup: Karen didn’t hit John but she had been drinking. This can never be resolved while both charges are on the same docket. Is there recourse for this?

21. I remember that case

22. Thank you Attorney Melanie.

23. I’m in Toronto 🇨🇦

24. I remember the Christa Worthington case

25. Funny how judge reacts to one juror but not multiple others immediately

26. This JD aff seems a bit concerning with all the harassment stuff. Just strange. I hope its not friends and family….

27. Curious…do they always call CW "Plantiff"??

28. Also the Substance over form came straight from a court case. Just because it wasn't written down (thanks to how judge instructed..all must be filled out before turned in and no questions)

29. 13:37. Dismiss the two counts or Court to bring in the jurors to pose the simple question that the judge failed to do as required by MA Criminal Law when there are multiple indictments the judge is absolutely supposed to ask if they are at an impasse on one, two, or all of the separate indictments. It is readily available in MA Criminal Procedures. To make this right, she MUST AT THE VERY LEAST CALL jurors back.

30. I just want to know how the vote came down. That’s it don’t need the names

31. That Bev let the harassments come in, was a really big mistake, had nothing to do with the case of John O'keefe. One of many mistakes. I want the defense to send a motion yet again to recuse herself because the defendant feels that she will not get a fair trial because of the judge biases towards the CW. Change of venue? But where to? I want FBI to bring in JM for questioning. Saw Microdots video showing all the phone calls she made, BA, Kerry – all deleted. She's got some explaining to do. The truth must win. Thinking of Karen every day. The judge can question the jurors behind closed doors, just ask if it's correct about charge 1 & 3. Only question she needs to ask. We cannot let that go. That is not justice. The jury's name should stay closed until this case is Closed/Solved. The correct people for that unaliving should be charged. They dragged Paul – Maya trial – into open court. This juror had to hire her own LAWYER because of this, just like Paul. Insane. This case are seen internationally. We see what Canton people is going through. "UNITED"?? states – NO! So much has to be changed to save the people & this country!

32. Yes, little Brian brought it up. If I recall correctly, he was the first to mention it.

33. ❤

34. People trot out 'in the public interest' when what they really mean is 'we all want to snoop'. What on earth can be served by releasing the names of the jurors? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

35. Watching from Cambridgeshire, 🇬🇧

36. i understand keeping it sealed but cops have already identified them

37. if i was a juror on this casei would sue the da for wasting my time after i voted to a quit

38. Hello from South Africa

39. All action, is motivated action.

    We can then assume at face value that this Juror, acted out of fear. Only if you are that afraid, why act at all?

    Shouldn't you then rather be disappearing from the grid?

    Which poses the question – who motivated this Juror to become verbal (despite his/her fear), with all this 'being so afraid' mumbo jumbo?

    Is this meant to be a message, a subtle threat to the remaining Jurors? Those who have remained silent up to now?

40. My opinion, fwiw…

    I got the impression from the motion that they were primarily talking about being afraid of TB; I know the exhibits showed both sides but there was so much talk about “the blogger” in the actual motion that I really do think that was the focus. I don’t like a lot of the methods and language that TB uses but the fact that he was charged with witness intimidation while people like CA and Jillian Daniels openly threaten him is ridiculous; in reality, I would be much more worried about the McA’s than the FKR bunch. Regardless, putting myself in the jurors’ shoes, I’d rather my info stay private as well, as long as I felt my voice was heard. In a perfect world the jury wouldn’t have to worry about their safety and, in that case, full transparency is ideal. We aren’t living in a perfect world, even from a distance; the jury actually has to LIVE in their community. The fact that several agencies seem to be involved makes things worse, imo. As we all sit here and wonder how high the corruption goes, I can only imagine the fear they may live with.

    I don’t care who was on the jury but I do care about what verdict they reached. I hope that Bev does follow up with them, even if it’s in chambers with attorneys present…but, frankly, I don’t trust her and I do feel that she may somehow twist things so that she uses this juror’s motion as a way to avoid questioning the jury. The whole situation is a sad mess.

Comments are closed.